Presentation by
Jon Borschow
Chairman of the Board
Healthcare Distribution Management Association
At the FDA Anti-Counterfeit Drug Initiative Public Meeting
October 15, 2003
Good morning and thank you for allowing me this opportunity to speak.
I am Jon Borschow, President of Borschow Hospital and Medical Supplies,
Inc. I'm here today, however, speaking as Chairman of the Healthcare
Distribution Management Association. HDMA is a national trade association
representing 89 distributors of pharmaceutical and healthcare products.
These distributors constitute nearly 100% of the pharmaceutical wholesale
distribution market, totaling more than $140 billion in annual sales.
HDMA members are responsible for ensuring that billions of units
of medication safely make their way to tens of thousands of retail
pharmacies, hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, and other provider
sites across the United States.
HDMA's mission is to secure the safe and effective distribution
of healthcare products, to create and exchange industry knowledge
affecting the future of distribution management, and to influence
standards and business processes that produce efficient healthcare
commerce.
With that mission in mind, I am delighted to have this opportunity
to highlight HDMA's perspectives on FDA's Interim Anti-Counterfeit
report, and to tell you about HDMA's groundbreaking work to help
fight the public health threat of counterfeit drugs.
HDMA is very pleased to see that the FDA is concerned about state
licensure. There is a high degree of variability among the states
regarding the type and intensity of oversight they carry out both
in issuing a license, and in following up after a license is issued.
Some states also are too lax when it comes to penalties for counterfeiters.
It is essential that all regulatory bodies be cognizant of their
responsibility to enforce the law and to protect against the entry
of adulterated product in the pharmaceutical supply chain.
Some states have thorough and effective programs for examining
the credentials and qualifications of those who wish to become
wholesale distributors, and for inspecting distribution facilities.
Yet other states have licensed hundreds of wholesalers to distribute
pharmaceuticals, although HDMA's 89 members constitute nearly 100%
of the wholesale distribution business. That said, it is clear
that stronger licensure and inspection programs are critical to
the success of any anti-counterfeit initiative.
HDMA is also pleased that the FDA recognizes that there is no
single "magic
bullet" solution to the counterfeit problem, and that a multi-pronged,
total supply-chain strategy is needed to protect the safety of
the U.S. pharmaceutical supply. HDMA has closely studied this problem,
and we are in full agreement that this effort cannot be accomplished
by one part of the industry alone. Federal regulators enforce anti-counterfeit
laws; states serve as the licensing entities that initially approve,
inspect, and regulate the firms doing business; and manufacturers
control the packaging or other anti-counterfeit characteristics
of the drugs they provide. Counterfeit drugs are a supply chain
issue, and we are all invested in solutions.
We wholeheartedly agree with the FDA that safeguards are needed
in all of the transactions processed in the supply chain.
With this in mind, our members have developed a set of voluntary
best practices that we call our "Recommended Guidelines
for Pharmaceutical Distribution System Integrity."
Pharmaceutical wholesalers have been following similar business
practices for a number of years. But recognizing our unique position
in handling pharmaceutical products, we decided it was time to
come together, pool our combined knowledge and experience, and
raise the bar even further regarding our own due diligence.
Aside from our guidelines, HDMA does support covert, overt, and
forensic packaging features, as well as industry adoption of track
and trace technology that uniquely identifies the product units
wholesalers ship to providers, as part of a complete and effective
security strategy.
With this in mind, HDMA's Product Safety Task Force, a broad-based
coalition of pharmaceutical supply chain stakeholders, is examining
the business requirements needed for the implementation of track
and trace technology.
Track and trace technology supports the unique identification of
each individual product unit, allowing distributors to easily identify
and locate specific items in the supply chain.
The technology HDMA believes holds the most promise is radio frequency
identification (RFID). Using RFID technology, a tiny radio frequency
chip containing essential data in the form of an electronic product
code will allow supply chain stakeholders to track every unit of
medication in the country on an individual basis. By tying each product
unit to a unique ID, any item can be tracked through the entire
supply chain with an unalterable electronic pedigree. The EPC chip,
which can be thought of as a product's DNA, will be equipped with
high technology security protection that will make it impossible
to duplicate or steal the identity of an authentic unit.
Even if criminals developed the technology required to create
an exact replica of the EPC, the technology's ability to track
product movement from manufacturer to patient would detect duplicate
drugs in an incorrect location within the system.
In addition, EPC has other patient safety features built in. EPC
has the capability to constantly monitor the temperature conditions
of each unit of medication as it travels through the system to
ensure proper storage and handling. The technology also can track
product expiration dates, simplify the process of product recalls,
and reduce the number of medication errors by uniquely matching
a specific product to a specific patient.
Further, because the technology represents an opportunity to
improve efficiencies, EPC is far more cost effective than other
pedigree solutions.
The technology for case level implementation of track and trace,
as Wal-Mart has mandated, could be accomplished in as soon as six
months. Such implementation would allow the industry to perfect
the application of the technology and lay the groundwork for expanding
track and trace to encompass the individual product units wholesalers
ship to providers.
Perhaps most importantly, a track and trace technology would
take the burden of having to authenticate products off the providers.
Providers would merely purchase product through an authenticating
distributor with the complete assurance of product safety.
HDMA
is working closely with standards bodies to further the awareness,
adoption, and implementation of EPC in healthcare distribution,
and we recommend that this technology and others that improve patient
safety be implemented in the shortest possible timeframe. In the
case of EPC, we are encouraging our manufacturing partners to put
this technology in their product packaging, and to commit to early
adoption.
We also have approached other industry trade groups to create
broad-based support for our efforts. HDMA members dedicated to
this issue have started work with pharmaceutical manufacturers,
packaging suppliers, technology providers, wholesalers, and health
care providers, to provide a compendium of strategic and tactical
information on EPC. HDMA also plans to craft an industry-wide position
statement in support of EPC in an effort to continue the momentum
behind a safe and efficient supply chain. |