Current News

H1N1 Influenza A Virus Information

HDMA Recognizes AmerisourceBergen Packaging Group and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals with Inaugural Distribution Management Award

HDMA Elevates Bittman to Chief Operating Officer, Introduces Naylor as Vice President for Meetings

Statement of HDMA President and CEO John M. Gray on the Importation of Prescription Drugs

DIANA, Nexus and Power of Partnership Awards Presented at 2009 Annual Leadership Forum

Distributors Work with States to Take On Flu Pandemic Challenge


Visit HDMA News Center >


print page

 


 

 

Tax Issues

Gross Receipts Tax

Gross receipts taxes, also referred to as “turnover” taxes, are imposed on sales at each stage of the supply chain, e.g., on suppliers, manufacturers, distributors and retailers.  Unlike a corporate income tax, businesses must pay gross receipts tax whether they are profitable or not. 

Revenue shortfalls have prompted some states to consider, and in rare cases, adopt, gross receipts taxes to supplement or replace other business taxes.   Gross receipts taxes distort production and consumption decisions because the amount of tax imposed on any particular good or service depends on how many different in-state firms are involved in the supply chain.  In addition, effective tax rates can differ widely by industry. 

Healthcare distribution is a “high-volume/low-profit margin” business that suffers disproportionately from a gross receipts tax.  The national average net profit margin of a pharmaceutical distributor is approximately 1.68% before taxes. [i] Given the business realities of operating in this competitive market, it is impossible for these companies to absorb the resulting negative financial impact of a gross receipts taxDistributors’ revenues are almost entirely and immediately offset by the costs of purchasing the medicines, since there is relatively no distributor mark-up.  A gross receipts tax, which generally is based on total sales revenue without consideration of operating costs or expenses (cost of medicine), has a significant financial impact on pharmaceutical distributors given the high dollar value of the products they carry.  For example, even if the gross receipts tax rate is relatively low, the total tax owed becomes substantial when it is multiplied by the high volume of high value pharmaceutical products sold by distributors each year.  The unique nature of the distribution business model will result in a disproportionately high tax, compared with other industries.

 

Last-In First-Out (LIFO)

LIFO has been an established and recognized accounting method in the U.S. since the 1930s and is utilized for tax reporting purposes by a broad spectrum of business sectors that sell a wide range of products.  Under the LIFO method, it is assumed that the last items produced or acquired are the first items sold, allowing a taxpayer to match its current revenues against its current costs.  LIFO accounting is particularly prevalent in the pharmaceutical distribution industry, with companies using LIFO accounting for 96 percent of inventories and net sales in 2006. [ii]

Recent legislative and regulatory proposals would repeal the ability of companies to continue using LIFO.  Eliminating the ability to elect the LIFO method would have a grossly disproportionate impact upon pharmaceutical distributors with inventories of high volume, high value medications. Its repeal would unfairly reverse long-standing tax policy and result in an unprecedented tax increase for these companies.

 


[i] 2007-2008 HDMA Factbook, Healthcare Distribution Management Association (2007).

[ii] Healthcare Distribution Management Association, Tax Accounting for Inventories and the Pharmaceutical Distribution Industry (October 21, 2008)

 

State Activities

Federal Activities

 

Contacts
Liz Gallenagh
Vice President, Government Affairs
703-885-0234
egallenagh@hdmanet.org

 
© Copyright Healthcare Distribution Management Association.
All rights reserved.
HDMA: M | C | D
Do you have suggestions
for our site?
URL: